4.3 Article

Buteyko Breathing Technique for Exertion-Induced Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion (EI-PVFM)

Journal

JOURNAL OF VOICE
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 40-51

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.017

Keywords

Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion; Exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction; Vocal cord dysfunction; Dyspnea; Exertion; Chronic cough

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate the impact of Buteyko breathing technique on dyspnea and hyperventilation in patients with exertion-induced PVFM. The results showed that BBT treatment had a positive effect on patients, with improvements in dyspnea severity and respiratory indicators post-treatment, indicating the need for further research.
Purpose. The primary purpose of the current study was to determine the usefulness of Buteyko breathing technique (BBT) in reducing dyspnea in patients with one form of Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion (PVFM), exertion-induced PVFM (EI-PVFM), concomitant with hyperventilation. The secondary purpose was to determine whether BBT had an effect on physiological markers of hyperventilation, as speculated by BBT theory: respiratory tidal minute volume (RTMV), end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), and resting heart rate (HR). Methods. Using a within-subjects, repeated measures group design, 12 participants with EI-PVFM and hyperventilation underwent 12 weeks of BBT, following an initial no-treatment control condition. Outcome measures of PVFM-dyspnea frequency and severity-and of hyperventilation-HR, RTMV, and ETCO2-were acquired pre- and post-treatment. Results. Results showed post-treatment decreases in dyspnea severity, HR, and RTMV, as well as increases in ETCO2. Decreases in dyspnea and RTMV measures remained after correction for alpha inflation. Conclusions. Findings suggest BBT may be useful for some individuals with EI-PVFM and hyperventilation. The high prevalence of hyperventilation in EI-PVFM found in the current study warrants further investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available