4.0 Article

Leukocyte-Endothelium Interaction in the Sublingual Microcirculation of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 8-15

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000501826

Keywords

Sublingual microcirculation; Leukocytes; Cardiac surgery; Incident dark-field imaging; Frame averaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to apply an innovative methodology to incident dark-field (IDF) imaging in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients for the identification and quantification of rolling leukocytes along the sublingual microcirculatory endothelium. Methods: This study was a post hoc analysis of a prospective study that evaluated the perioperative course of the sublingual microcirculation in CABG patients. Video images were captured using IDF imaging following the induction of anesthesia (T-0) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (T-1) in 10 patients. Rolling leukocytes were identified and quantified using frame averaging, which is a technique that was developed for correctly identifying leukocytes. Results: The number of rolling leukocytes increased significantly from T-0 (7.5 [6.4-9.1] leukocytes/capillary-postcapillary venule/4 s) to T-1 (14.8 [13.2-15.5] leukocytes/capillary-postcapillary venule/4 s) (p < 0.0001). A significant increase in systemic leukocyte count was also detected from 7.4 +/- 0.9 x 10(9)/L (preoperative) to 12.4 +/- 4.4 x 10(9)/L (postoperative) (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The ability to directly visualize leukocyte-endothelium interaction using IDF imaging facilitates the diagnosis of a systemic inflammatory response after CPB via the identification of rolling leukocytes. Integration of the frame averaging algorithm into the software of handheld vital microscopes may enable the use of microcirculatory leukocyte count as a real-time parameter at the bedside.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available