4.4 Article

Dodecafluoropentane Emulsion in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Phase Ib/II Randomized and Controlled Dose-Escalation Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1244-1250

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.04.020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Jonathan S. Fitch Distinguished Chair in Stroke and Neurocritical Care of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS)
  2. Fund to Cure Stroke of UAMS
  3. National Institutes of Health [UL1TR0000039]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-escalation acute ischemic stroke trial was designed to demonstrate maximum tolerated dose, characterize adverse events (AEs), and explore clinical outcomes when intravenous dodecafluoropentane emulsion (DDFPe) was used as neuroprotection. Methods: Acute ischemic stroke patients (n = 24) with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 2-20 were randomized to either 3 doses of intravenous DDFPe or placebo, 1 every 90 minutes, starting within 12 hours of symptom onset. Doses were given without affecting standard stroke care. Each of the 3 dose cohorts included 8 patients, with 2 receiving placebo and 6 receiving DDFPe. Primary outcomes were serious adverse events (SAEs), AEs, NIHSS score, and modified Rankin Score (mRS). Results: No dose-limiting toxicities were encountered, and no maximum tolerated dose was defined. One unrelated delayed death occurred in a DDFPe patient, and another occurred in the placebo group. Group SAEs and AEs were similar in incidence and severity. Early initiation of DDFPe treatment resulted in better NIHSS score response than late initiation (P = .03). Thirty- and 90-day mRS after high-dose therapy suggested clinical improvement (P = .01 and P = .03, respectively). However, the significance of differences in clinical outcomes was limited by small patient numbers and differences in stroke severity between cohorts. Conclusions: Intravenous DDFPe appears to be safe at all doses tested. Clinical improvements in NIHSS score and mRS were significant but compromised by small sample size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available