4.6 Article

Variation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Outcomes in Asian American Men: A Multicenter Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 203, Issue 3, Pages 530-535

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000534

Keywords

prostatic neoplasms; Asian continental ancestry group; image-guided; biopsy; magnetic resonance imaging; risk assessment

Funding

  1. Frederick J. and Theresa Dow Wallace Fund of the New York Community Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Asian American men have distinctly different prostate cancer epidemiology than other men. To our knowledge the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for elevated prostate specific antigen in this population has not been assessed. We sought to define imaging and targeted biopsy outcomes in Asian American men compared to other men. Materials and Methods: We accrued a multicenter, prospective cohort of men who underwent magnetic resonance imaging targeted and systematic biopsy for elevated prostate specific antigen. The outcome of interest was a diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater) stratified by the PI-RADS (TM) (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System) score and a history of negative biopsy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the effect of Asian American race on cancer detection. Results: Of the 2,571 men 275 (11%) were Asian American. Clinically significant prostate cancer was detected in 37% of Asian American men compared to 48% of men of other races (p < 0.001). Asian American men were also less likely to be diagnosed with Grade Group 1 cancer (12% vs 18%, p=0.007). Additionally, there was significantly lower detection of significant cancer using PI-RADS 3 in Asian American men vs men of other races (12% vs 21%, p=0.032). On adjusted analysis Asian American men were less likely to be diagnosed with significant cancer (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42-0.79, p < 0.001) and Grade Group 1 cancer (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.84, p=0.005) than nonAsian men. Conclusions: Asian American men are less likely to be diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer on targeted biopsy, illustrating the different performance of PI-RADS in this population. Conventional risk assessment tools should be modified when selecting Asian American men for biopsy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available