4.6 Article

A controller for walking derived from how humans recover from perturbations

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 16, Issue 157, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0027

Keywords

locomotion; walking; feedback control; system identification; hybrid systems; robotics

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation CMMI grant [1538342, 1254842]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1538342, 1254842] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans can walk without falling despite some external perturbations, but the control mechanisms by which this stability is achieved have not been fully characterized. While numerous walking simulations and robots have been constructed, no full-state walking controller for even a simple model of walking has been derived from human walking data. Here, to construct such a feedback controller, we applied thousands of unforeseen perturbations to subjects walking on a treadmill and collected data describing their recovery to normal walking. Using these data, we derived a linear controller to make the classical inverted pendulum model of walking respond to perturbations like a human. The walking model consists of a point-mass with two massless legs and can be controlled only through the appropriate placement of the foot and the push-off impulse applied along the trailing leg. We derived how this foot placement and push-off impulse are modulated in response to upper-body perturbations in various directions. This feedback-controlled biped recovers from perturbations in a manner qualitatively similar to human recovery. The biped can recover from perturbations over twenty times larger than deviations experienced during normal walking and the biped's stability is robust to uncertainties, specifically, large changes in body and feedback parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available