4.7 Article

Biomarkers and Clinical Cardiovascular Outcomes With Ezetimibe in the IMPROVE-IT Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 74, Issue 8, Pages 1057-1068

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.038

Keywords

biomarkers; personalized medicine; secondary prevention; SIHD

Funding

  1. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp.
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) T32 postdoctoral training grant [T32HL007604]
  3. American Heart Association Strategically Focused Research Network in Vascular Disease grant [18SFRN3390085, 18SFRN33960262]
  4. Daiichi-Sankyo
  5. Amgen
  6. Merck
  7. Eisai
  8. AstraZeneca
  9. Abbott Laboratories
  10. Critical Diagnostics
  11. Genzyme
  12. Gilead
  13. GlaxoSmithKline
  14. Intarcia
  15. Janssen Research and Development
  16. The Medicines Company
  17. MedImmune
  18. Novartis
  19. Poxel
  20. Roche Diagnostics
  21. Takeda
  22. Roche Diagnostics Corporation
  23. Takeda Global Research and Development Center
  24. Waters Technologies Corporation
  25. Boehringer Ingelheim
  26. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  27. Janssen
  28. Savara
  29. Duke University
  30. BRAHMS
  31. Eisai Co.
  32. Merck Co.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy reduces the risk of recurrent cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with prior acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The role of biomarkers in identifying subsets of patients who may derive greater clinical benefit with ezetimibe is unknown. OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the role of established CV biomarkers in assessing likely benefit with ezetimibe added to statin therapy in post-ACS patients. METHODS In a pre-specified nested analysis within a randomized, double-blind trial of ezetimibe/simvastatin versus placebo/simvastatin (IMPROVE-IT [Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial]), high-sensitivity troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, growth-differentiation factor-15, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured in 7,195 patients stabilized (1 month post-randomization) after ACS. A multimarker approach based on biomarker values was used to examine the risk of recurrent CV events and clinical benefit with ezetimibe. RESULTS Elevated levels of each biomarker were independently associated with higher risks of CV death/myocardial infarction/stroke and CV death/heart failure (p(trend) < 0.001 for each). There was a pattern of greater absolute risk reduction in CV death/myocardial infarction/stroke with the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy in patients at higher risk on the basis of biomarker levels. High-risk patients (>= 3 biomarkers positive; n = 1,437) had an absolute risk difference of -7.3% (95% confidence interval: -13.8% to -0.8%; p = 0.02) with ezetimibe, and intermediate-risk patients (1 to 2 biomarkers positive; n = 3,842) had an absolute risk difference of -4.4% (95% confidence interval: -9.7% to 0.8%), translating into numbers needed to treat at 7 years of 14 and 23, respectively. Low-risk patients (0 biomarkers positive; n = 1,916) did not appear to benefit from the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy. CONCLUSIONS A biomarker-based strategy identifies a gradient of risk among patients post-ACS, offering the potential to identify higher-risk patients with a correspondingly high absolute benefit from the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available