4.8 Article

Improving Photocatalysis for the Reduction of CO2 through Non-covalent Supramolecular Assembly

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 141, Issue 38, Pages 14961-14965

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b07067

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR), Basic Research Initiative (BRI) [FA9550-12-1-0414]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0016450]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0016450] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the enhancement of photocatalytic performance by introduction of hydrogen-bonding interactions to a Re bipyridine catalyst and Ru photosensitizer system (ReDAC/RuDAC) by the addition of amide substituents, with carbon monoxide (CO) and carbonate/bicarbonate as products. This system demonstrates a more-than-3-fold increase in turnover number (TONCO = 100 +/- 4) and quantum yield (Phi(CO) = 23.3 +/- 0.8%) for CO formation compared to the control system using unsubstituted Ru photosensitizer (RuBPY) and ReDAC (TONCO = 28 +/- 4 and Phi(CO) = 7 +/- 1%) in acetonitrile (MeCN) with 1,3-dimethyl-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (BIH) as sacrificial reductant. In dimethylformamide (DMF), a solvent that disrupts hydrogen bonds, the ReDAC/RuDAC system showed a decrease in catalytic performance while the control system exhibited an increase, indicating the role of hydrogen bonding in enhancing the photocatalysis for CO2 reduction through supramolecular assembly. The similar properties of RuDAC and RuBPY demonstrated in lifetime measurements, spectroscopic analysis, and electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical studies revealed that the enhancement in photocatalysis is due not to differences in intrinsic properties of the catalyst or photosensitizer, but to hydrogen-bonding interactions between them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available