4.7 Article

Optical transition and luminescence properties of Sm3+-doped YNbO4 powder phosphors

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages 1037-1045

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.16717

Keywords

energy transfer; J-O parameters; luminescence thermal quenching; YNbO4; Sm3+ powders

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11104023, 11704056, 11774042]
  2. Dalian Innovation Support Program [2016RQ037]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [20170520097, 20180550553]
  4. Dalian Maritime University [YJG2019210, YJG2019209]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3132019186, 3132016333]
  6. State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics [IOSKL2019KF06, IOSKL2018KF02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of YNbO4: Sm3+ powder phosphors with different doping concentrations were synthesized by a traditional high-temperature solid-state reaction method. The crystal structure of the obtained samples was characterized by means of X-ray diffraction. Concentration quenching, energy-transfer mechanism, and luminescence thermal stability of YNbO4: Sm3+ samples were studied through the fluorescence spectra and decays. It was concluded that electric dipole-dipole interaction was the dominant energy-transfer mechanism between Sm3+ ions according to both Van Uitert's model and Dexter's model. Using the Arrhenius model, crossover process was proven to be responsible for the luminescence thermal quenching of Sm3+. Moreover, a novel approach for evaluating the optical transition properties of Sm3+ ion in YNbO4 powders using the diffuse-diffraction spectrum and fluorescence decay was examined in the framework of Judd-Ofelt (J-O) theory. It was confirmed that the J-O parameters omega(lambda) (lambda = 2, 4, 6) of Sm3+ in YNbO4 powder were reliable by comparing the radiation transition rate with the measured emission results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available