4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

MICROBIAL AND MICROPARASITE ABUNDANCE IN CAGE-CULTURED ABALONE HALIOTIS ASININA

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 405-411

Publisher

NATL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2983/035.038.0223

Keywords

abalone; Haliotis asinina; dilution plate count technique; microbial abundance; microparasite; cage culture

Funding

  1. CHED DARETO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microorganisms and parasites are some of the major threats to aquaculture, including abalone culture worldwide; however, few reports concerning these microbes and parasites in abalone have been published. Moreover, several studies were conducted to determine the microbial load and degree of parasitism in abalone of other species but not the abalone Haliotis asinina of the Philippines, particularly in Palawan. This study was conducted to assess the abundance of microorganisms and microparasites in the cage-cultured abalone. The microbial abundance was determined by dilution plate count technique. Slide sampling and scoring was performed using methylene blue and acetocarmine stains to determine the abundance of microparasites. Results revealed that fungi have the highest total abundance among the four functional groups of microorganisms present in abalone. The Gram-positive bacteria had the highest abundance in the digestive tract (178 x 10(3) CFU/g). Actinomycetes had the highest abundance in the gonad (35 x 10(3) CFU/g). On the other hand, fungi had the highest abundance in the gills (198 x 10(3) CFU/g) and in the mantle (95 x 10(3) CFU/g). The highest abundance of microorganisms was found in the digestive tract of abalone. Microparasites such as trematodes, nematodes, copepods, and protozoans were found in cage-cultured abalones. Among these microparasites, trematodes were found abundant in the gills, whereas protozoans were abundant in the stomach of abalones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available