4.6 Article

Development and validation of a UPLC-MS/MS analytical method for dofetilide in mouse plasma and urine, and its application to pharmacokinetic study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages 183-188

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.04.041

Keywords

Dofetilide; UPLC-MS/MS; Pharmacokinetics; Mouse plasma; Mouse urine

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01CA215802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel method using UPLC with tandem mass-spectrometric detection (UPLC-MS/MS) with positive electrospray ionization was developed for the detection of the antiarrhythmic drug, dofetilide, in mouse plasma and urine. Protein precipitation was performed on 10 mu L of plasma and 2 mu L of urine samples using dofetilide-D4 as an internal standard, and separation of the analyte was accomplished on a C18 analytical column with the flow of 0.40 mL/min. Subsequently, the method was successfully applied to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of dofetilide following oral and intravenous administration. The calibration curve was linear over the selected concentration range (R-2 >= 0.99), with a lower limit of quantitation of 5 ng/mL. The intra-day and inter-day precisions, and accuracies obtained from a 5-day validation ranged from 3.00 to 7.10%, 3.80-7.20%, and 93.0-106% for plasma, and 3.50-9.00%, 3.70-10.0%, 87.0-106% for urine, while the recovery of dofetilide was 93.7% and 97.4% in plasma and urine, respectively. The observed pharmacokinetic profiles revealed that absorption is the rate-limiting step in dofetilide distribution and elimination. Pharmacokinetic studies illustrate that the absolute bioavailability of dofetilide in the FVB strain mice is 34.5%. The current developed method allows for accurate and precise quantification of dofetilide in micro-volumes of plasma and urine, and was found to be suitable for supporting in vivo pharmacokinetic studies. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available