4.5 Article

Controls of CO2-N2 gas flood ratios on enhanced shale gas recovery and ultimate CO2 sequestration

Journal

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages 1037-1045

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.098

Keywords

CO2-Enhanced shale gas recovery; N-2- enhanced shale gas recovery; Adsorption and desorption; CO2 sequestration; Permeability evolution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary production of less than 25% of original gas in place (OGIP) may be elevated by enhanced shale gas recovery (ESGR) using either pure CO2 or N-2 as injected stimulants. Alternatively, injecting mixtures of CO2 and N-2 may potentially optimize recovery of natural gas and beneficially sequester CO2. We develop a dual-porosity, dual-permeability finite element (FEM) model coupled with multi-component gas flow and sorption behavior to 1) explore the evolution of sorption-induced strain resulting from competitive adsorption and its influence on the matrix and fracture permeability; 2) define cumulative production of CH4 and 3) evaluate the amount of CO2 sequestered in the reservoir; Results show that pure-CO2 injection can increase shale gas recovery by similar to 20%. Conversely, pure-N-2 injection can increase shale gas recovery by similar to 80%. Injecting mixtures of CO2 and N-2 can increase shale gas recovery between these end-member magnitudes of similar to 20%-similar to 80% depending on the gas composition. We show that a higher proportion of CO2 in the injected CO2-N-2 mixture will result in the decreased recovery of shale gas. However, at the same injection pressure, injecting CO2-N-2 mixtures with a higher proportion of CO2 does not always result in more CO2 sequestered in the reservoir. Indeed, when the CO2 injection ratio is > 70%, as explored in this study, increasing the CO2 injection ratio will result in less CO2 sequestered. This is because, as the CO2-N-2 gas ratio increases, shale gas recovery decreases and results in more CH4 left in the reservoir to compete with CO2 for sorption sites and finally resulting in less CO2 sequestered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available