4.0 Article

NO EVIDENCE OF TOXOPLASMA GONDII EXPOSURE IN SOUTH AUSTRALIAN KOALAS (PHASCOLARCTOS CINEREUS)

Journal

JOURNAL OF PARASITOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages 638-641

Publisher

ALLEN PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1645/19-40

Keywords

Toxoplasma; Seroprevalence; Epidemiology; Ecology; Koala; Island; Freedom; Demonstration of Freedom

Categories

Funding

  1. Schultz Foundation
  2. Morris Animal Foundation [D16ZO-829]
  3. Australian Wildlife Society
  4. Nature Foundation of South Australia
  5. Sir Mark Mitchell Foundation
  6. Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
  7. Ecological Society of Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infection with the cat-borne parasite Toxoplasma gondii has been detected in numerous Australian marsupials and can lead to severe disease (toxoplasmosis) in some cases. The seroprevalence of Toxoplasma on Kangaroo Island, South Australia has been reported to be higher than the South Australian mainland in macropods, cats, and sheep, suggesting an increased risk of infection on this island. However, Toxoplasma seroprevalence in small- and medium-sized terrestrial mammals was almost zero on the island and did not differ from that on the mainland. We surveyed Toxoplasma seroprevalence in koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) populations on the island and on the mainland and assessed their risk of infection and their role in the life cycle of Toxoplasma. All screened koalas from the island (n = 94) and the mainland (n = 63) were seronegative. This represents the largest Toxoplasma seroprevalence survey in this species and provided sufficient evidence to confidently demonstrate freedom from parasite exposure in both island and mainland populations at the time of the survey. Because koalas are extensively arboreal and predominately consume tree foliage, they appear to be at negligible risk of Toxoplasma infection. Furthermore, as koalas are rarely consumed by cats, we suggest that they have a minor role in the parasite's life cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available