4.5 Article

Effect of impaction energy on dynamic bone strains, fixation strength, and seating of cementless acetabular cups

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 2367-2375

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.24418

Keywords

energy; fixation; fracture; impaction; stability

Categories

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/K027549/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K027549/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seating a cementless acetabular cup via impaction is a balancing act; good cup fixation must be obtained to ensure adequate bone in-growth and cup apposition, while acetabular fracture must be avoided. Good impaction technique is essential to the success of hip arthroplasty. Yet little guidance exists in the literature to inform surgeons on how hard to hit. A drop rig and synthetic bone model were used to vary the energy of impaction strikes in low and high-density synthetic bone, while key parameters such as dynamic strain (quantifying fracture risk), implant fixation, and polar gap were measured. For high energy impaction (15 J) in low-density synthetic bone, a peak tensile strain was observed during impaction that was up to 3.4x as large as post-strike strain, indicating a high fracture risk. Diminishing returns were observed for pushout fixation with increasing energy. Eighty-five percent of the pushout fixation achieved using a 15 J impaction strike was attained by using a 7.5 J strike energy. Similarly, polar gap was only minimally reduced at high impaction energies. Therefore it is suggested that higher energy strikes increase fracture risk, but do not offer large improvements to fixation or implant-bone apposition. It may difficult be for surgeons to accurately deliver specific impaction energies, suggesting there is scope for operative tools to manage implant seating. (c) 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research (R) published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society J Orthop Res

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available