4.5 Article

Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility measurements in simulated fluids by 96-well plate method in early drug discovery

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 1561-1567

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.02.013

Keywords

Thermodynamic equilibrium solubility; Physiological medium; 96-Well plate; UV detection; Shake flask method; QSPR study

Funding

  1. ICMR [45/33/2013/NAN-BMS]
  2. CSIR - India 12th FYP grant [BSC-0205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An early prediction of solubility in physiological media (PBS, SGF and SIF) is useful to predict qualitatively bioavailability and absorption of lead candidates. Despite of the availability of multiple solubility estimation methods, none of the reported method involves simplified fixed protocol for diverse set of compounds. Therefore, a simple and medium-throughput solubility estimation protocol is highly desirable during lead optimization stage. The present work introduces a rapid method for assessment of thermodynamic equilibrium solubility of compounds in aqueous media using 96-well microplate. The developed protocol is straightforward to set up and takes advantage of the sensitivity of UV spectroscopy. The compound, in stock solution in methanol, is introduced in microgram quantities into microplate wells followed by drying at an ambient temperature. Microplates were shaken upon addition of test media and the supernatant was analyzed by UV method. A plot of absorbance versus concentration of a sample provides saturation point, which is thermodynamic equilibrium solubility of a sample. The established protocol was validated using a large panel of commercially available drugs and with conventional miniaturized shake flask method (r(2) > 0.84). Additionally, the statistically significant QSPR models were established using experimental solubility values of 52 compounds. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available