4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Further understanding of the Ru-centered [2+2] cycloreversion/cycloaddition involved into the interconversion of ruthenacyclobutane using the Grubbs catalysts from a reaction force analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-019-4150-0

Keywords

Ru-centered [2+2] cycloreversion; cycloaddition; Reaction force constant; Grubbs catalysts; Density functional calculations

Funding

  1. CONICYT through the FONDECYT projects [3170117, 1180158, 1181914]
  2. CONICYT+PAI+CONVOCATORIA NACIONAL SUBVENCION A INSTALACION EN LA ACADEMIA CONVOCATORIA ANO 2018 [PAI77180024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical reactivity of the first- and second-generation Grubbs catalysts has always been a significant issue in olefin metathesis. In the present work, we study the [2+2] cycloreversion/cycloaddition and the alkylidene rotation involved into the interconversion of the ruthenacyclobutane intermediate, through the reaction force and reaction force constant analysis. It has been found that the structural contribution controls the barrier energy in the interconversion of ruthenacyclobutane via [2+2] cycloreversion/cycloaddition, which is slightly lower in the second generation of Grubbs catalysts while its electronic contribution is slightly higher, which unveils a major rigidity and donor/acceptor properties of the NHC. This finding explains a greater structural contribution in the rate constant. Moreover, on the basis of the reaction force constant, the process can be classified as two-stage-concerted reactions, noting a more asynchronous process when the first generation is used as a catalyst. Finally, a similar analysis into the alkylidene rotation was performed. It was determined that [2+2] cycloreversion and alkylidene rotations take place in a sequential manner, the energy barrier is again controlled by structural reorganization, and the pathway is less asynchronous.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available