4.6 Article

Potent reduction of plasma lipoprotein (a) with an antisense oligonucleotide in human subjects does not affect ex vivo fibrinolysis[S]

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 12, Pages 2082-2089

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.P094763

Keywords

apolipoprotein(a); thrombosis; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Funding

  1. Ionis Pharmaceuticals
  2. Pfizer/ASPIRE Cardiovascular Awards

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is postulated that lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] inhibits fibrinolysis, but this hypothesis has not been tested in humans due to the lack of specific Lp(a) lowering agents. Patients with elevated Lp(a) were randomized to antisense oligonucleotide [IONIS-APO(a)(Rx)] directed to apo(a) (n = 7) or placebo (n = 10). Ex vivo plasma lysis times and antigen concentrations of plasminogen, factor XI, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, and fibrinogen at baseline, day 85/92/99 (peak drug effect), and day 190 (3 months off drug) were measured. The mean +/- SD baseline Lp(a) levels were 477.3 +/- 55.9 nmol/l in IONIS-APO(a)(Rx) and 362.1 +/- 89.9 nmol/l in placebo. The mean +/- SD percentage change in Lp(a) for IONIS-APO(a)(Rx) was -69.3 +/- 12.2% versus -5.4 +/- 6.9% placebo (P < 0.0010) at day 85/92/99 and -15.6 +/- 8.9% versus 3.2 +/- 12.2% (P = 0.003) at day 190. Clot lysis times and coagulation/fibrinolysis-related biomarkers showed no significant differences between IONIS-APO(a)(Rx) and placebo at all time points. Clot lysis times were not affected by exogenously added Lp(a) at concentrations up to 200 nmol/l to plasma with very low (12.5 nmol/l) Lp(a) levels, whereas recombinant apo(a) had a potent antifibrinolytic effect. In conclusion, potent reductions of Lp(a) in patients with highly elevated Lp(a) levels do not affect ex vivo measures of fibrinolysis; the relevance of any putative antifibrinolytic effects of Lp(a) in vivo needs further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available