4.3 Article

Diagnostic value of heat shock protein 90α and squamous cell carcinoma antigen in detection of cervical cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 11, Pages 5518-5525

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0300060519865634

Keywords

Cervical lesions; heat shock protein 90 alpha; squamous cell carcinoma antigen; high-risk HPV; biomarkers

Funding

  1. Xinjiang Natural Science Foundation of China [2018D01C261]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To ascertain plasma levels of heat shock protein 90 alpha (HSP90 alpha) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) and their diagnostic potential in cervical cancer. Methods In a cross-sectional study, patients' cervical tissue samples were screened for high risk (HR) human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA and underwent a thinprep-liquid based cytology test (TCT). Plasma samples were analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for HSP90 alpha and SCC-Ag levels. Results Of the 295 women who underwent screening, 75 were healthy controls 75 (HR-HPV-ve TCT-ve), 110 were HR-HPV+ve, TCT-ve and 110 were HR-HPV+ve TCT+ve. There were significant differences between levels of HSP90 alpha and SCC-Ag proteins across the patient groups with those positive for cervical cancer having the greatest levels of proteins compared with other groups. For patients with high grade SCC there was a significant correlation between levels of HSP90 alpha and SCC-Ag. The area under the ROC curve for combined HSP90 alpha*SCC-Ag was the largest compared with the single proteins. Using a cut-off value of 16.4 ng/ml to delineate cervical cancer diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity of HSP90 alpha*SCC-Ag were 90.3% and 95.1% respectively. Conclusion Plasma HSP90 alpha protein levels correlated well with SCC-Ag levels in patients with cervical cancer and the combination of HSP90 alpha*SCC-Ag may be a useful diagnostic biomarker.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available