4.3 Article

An impaired glucagon-like peptide-1 response is associated with prediabetes in polycystic ovary syndrome with obesity

Journal

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 47, Issue 10, Pages 4691-4700

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0300060519865351

Keywords

Prediabetes; glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) response; obesity; polycystic ovary syndrome; normal glucose tolerance; insulin

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Republic of Slovenia, Tertiary Care Scientific grant of the University Medical Centre, Ljubljana [20120047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Impaired glucose homeostasis in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is associated with obesity, age, and disease phenotype. This study aimed to investigate the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) response in patients with obesity and PCOS with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) or prediabetes. Methods Twenty-six women with obesity and PCOS were included. Thirteen women had NGT and 13 had prediabetes. Serum glucose, insulin, and GLP-1 levels were measured during an oral glucose tolerance test. Beta-cell function and insulin resistance were determined. Results Women with prediabetes had significantly lower GLP-1 levels than did those with NGT after a glucose load. GLP-1 levels <3.02 pM at 120 minutes were associated with prediabetes. Women with prediabetes had a lower oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS) index and greater amount of visceral adipose tissue than did those with NGT. Plasma GLP-1 levels at 120 minutes were correlated with visceral adiposity and the OGIS index. A change in GLP-1 levels was correlated with a family history of type 2 diabetes. Conclusion The GLP-1 response is lower in patients with obesity, PCOS, and prediabetes than in those with obesity, PCOS, and NGT. Further investigation of the GLP-1 response as a potential separate risk factor for prediabetes in PCOS is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available