4.8 Article

Transient elastography for screening of liver fibrosis: Cost-effectiveness analysis from six prospective cohorts in Europe and Asia

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages 1141-1151

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.019

Keywords

Alcohol-related liver disease; Liver fibrosis; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Stratified screening; Transient elastography

Funding

  1. EIT Health project 2018 [EIT 18258]
  2. BMBF Liver Systems Medicine [LiSyM 031L005]
  3. Innovation Fund Denmark
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [668031]
  5. ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion
  6. European Regional Development Fund FEDER
  7. [PI16/00043]
  8. MRC [MR/N005953/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background & Aims: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and alcohol-related liver disease pose an important challenge to current clinical healthcare pathways because of the large number of at-risk patients. Therefore, we aimed to explore the costeffectiveness of transient elastography (TE) as a screening method to detect liver fibrosis in a primary care pathway. Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using reallife individual patient data from 6 independent prospective cohorts (5 from Europe and 1 from Asia). A diagnostic algorithm with conditional inference trees was developed to explore the relationships between liver stiffness, socio-demographics, comorbidities, and hepatic fibrosis, the latter assessed by fibrosis scores (FIB-4, NFS) and liver biopsies in a subset of 352 patients. We compared the incremental cost-effectiveness of a screening strategy against standard of care alongside the numbers needed to screen to diagnose a patient with fibrosis stage >= F2. Results: The data set encompassed 6,295 participants (mean age 55 +/- 12 years, BMI 27 +/- 5 kg/m(2), liver stiffness 5.6 +/- 5.0 kPa). A 9.1 kPa TE cut-off provided the best accuracy for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (>= F2) in general population settings, whereas a threshold of 9.5 kPa was optimal for populations at-risk of alcohol-related liver disease. TE with the proposed cut-offs outperformed fibrosis scores in terms of accuracy. Screening with TE was cost-effective with mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranging from 2,570 (sic)/QALY (95% CI 2,456-2,683) for a population at-risk of alcohol-related liver disease (age >= 45 years) to 6,217 (sic)/QALY (95% CI 5,832-6,601) in the general population. Overall, there was a 12% chance of TE screening being cost saving across countries and populations. Conclusions: Screening for liver fibrosis with TE in primary care is a cost-effective intervention for European and Asian populations and may even be cost saving. Lay summary: The lack of optimized public health screening strategies for the detection of liver fibrosis in adults without known liver disease presents a major healthcare challenge. Analyses from 6 independent international cohorts, with transient elastography measurements, show that a communitybased risk-stratification strategy for alcohol-related and nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases is cost-effective and potentially cost saving for our healthcare systems, as it leads to earlier identification of patients. (C) 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available