4.4 Article

Identifying and mapping very small (<0.5 km2) mountain glaciers on coarse to high-resolution imagery

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 254, Pages 873-888

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2019.50

Keywords

Glacier fluctuations; glacier mapping; mountain glaciers; remote sensing

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council UK studentship [NE/L002590/1]
  2. Copernicus Glacier Service Norway [NIT.06.15.5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small mountain glaciers are an important part of the cryosphere and tend to respond rapidly to climate warming. Historically, mapping very small glaciers (generally considered to be <0.5 km(2)) using satellite imagery has often been subjective due to the difficulty in differentiating them from perennial snowpatches. For this reason, most scientists implement minimum size-thresholds (typically 0.01-0.05 km(2)). Here, we compare the ability of different remote-sensing approaches to identify and map very small glaciers on imagery of varying spatial resolutions (30-0.25 m) and investigate how operator subjectivity influences the results. Based on this analysis, we support the use of a minimum size-threshold of 0.01 km(2) for imagery with coarse to medium spatial resolution (30-10 m). However, when mapping on high-resolution imagery (<1 m) with minimal seasonal snow cover, glaciers <0.05 km(2) and even <0.01 km(2) are readily identifiable and using a minimum threshold may be inappropriate. For these cases, we develop a set of criteria to enable the identification of very small glaciers and classify them as certain, probable or possible. This should facilitate a more consistent approach to identifying and mapping very small glaciers on high-resolution imagery, helping to produce more comprehensive and accurate glacier inventories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available