4.6 Article

Development of surrogate standards approach for the determination of polyphenols in Vernonia amygdalina Del.

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2019.06.003

Keywords

Polyphenols; Vernonia amygdalina; Surrogate standards; HPLC-PDA method

Funding

  1. Fund of Scientific Research of the Plovdiv University [PhiPi17-XPhi-013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes an analytical approach for polyphenol components determination in Vernonia amygdalina Del. (VA) using surrogate standards, extracts of green coffee and Achillea asplenifolia 9602, and rutin as an internal standard. HPLC-PDA fingerprint profiles of the polyphenol complex of VA and surrogate standards were developed. By comparison between the chromatographic and spectral characteristics of VA and the surrogate standards using the relative retention times towards rutin, it was possible to identify the polyphenol components in VA. Additionally, peak identity was confirmed by HRMS spectra, to verify the truthfulness of the procedures. Recoveries of rutin, LOD, LOQ, and RSD% were determined, to validate the method as highly accurate and applicable. The polyphenol complex of VA contained dicaffeoylquinic acids and luteolin glycosides as main components. A method using Nucleosil C18 provided the best separation of 1,5- and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acids in VA. Their amount reached up to 1.49 +/- 0.21 mg g(-1). The content of 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid was 0.35 +/- 0.04 mg g(-1). Luteolin glycosides and luteolin were found at 0.40 +/- 0.04 mg g(-1) and 0.14 +/- 0.01 mg g(-1), respectively. The presence of luteolin 4'-O-glucoside, apigenin 7-O-rutinoside, apigenin 7-O-glucoside and apigenin as minor constituents in VA is reported for the first time. Results suggest the implementation of the surrogate standard approach in food analytical practice as highly advisable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available