4.7 Article

Raw oil palm frond leaves as cost-effective substrate for cellulase and xylanase productions by Trichoderma asperellum UC1 under solid-state fermentation

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages 206-217

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.113

Keywords

Solid-state fermentation; Oil palm frond leaves; Trichoderma asperellum; Cellulase; Xylanase; Lignocellulosic waste

Funding

  1. Research University Grant (GUP) from Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru [Q.J130000.2526.17H48]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Production of cellulases and xylanase by a novel Trichoderma asperellum UC1 (GenBank accession no. MF774876) under solid state fermentation (SSF) of raw oil palm frond leaves (OPFL) was optimized. Under optimum fermentation parameters (30 degrees C, 60-80% moisture content, 2.5 x 10(6) spores/g inoculum size) maximum CMCase, FPase, beta-glucosidase and xylanase activity were recorded at 136.16 IU/g, 26.03 U/g, 130.09 IU/g and 255.01 U/ g, respectively. Cellulases and xylanase were produced between a broad pH range of pH 6.0-12.0. The enzyme complex that comprised of four endo-beta-1,4-xylanases and endoglucanases, alongside exoglucanase and beta-glucosidase showed thermophilic and acidophilic characteristics at 50-60 degrees C and pH 3.0-4.0, respectively. Glucose (16.87 mg/g) and fructose (18.09 mg/g) were among the dominant sugar products from the in situ hydrolysis of OPFL, aside from cellobiose (105.92 mg/g) and xylose (1.08 mg/g). Thermal and pH stability tests revealed that enzymes CMCase, FPase, beta-glucosidase and xylanase retained 50% residual activities for up to 15.18, 4.06, 17.47 and 15.16 h of incubation at 60 degrees C, as well as 64.59, 25.14, 68.59 and 19.20 hat pH 4.0, respectively. Based on the findings, it appeared that the unique polymeric structure of raw OPFL favored cellulases and xylanase productions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available