4.3 Article

Single dose escalation studies with inhaled POL6014, a potent novel selective reversible inhibitor of human neutrophil elastase, in healthy volunteers and subjects with cystic fibrosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 299-304

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.08.020

Keywords

Neutrophil elastase inhibitor; Pharmacokinetics; Safety; Cystic fibrosis; Inflammation; Inhalation

Funding

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc. [POL6014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: POL6014 is a novel, orally inhaled neutrophil elastase (NE) inhibitor in development for cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods: Two studies, one in healthy volunteers (HVs, doses 20 to 960 mg) and one in subjects with CF (doses 80 to 320 mg) were conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of single ascending doses of inhaled POL6014 with a Pari eFlow (R) nebuliser. PK was evaluated over a period of 24 h. In addition. NE activity in a sputum was measured. Results: After single doses, POL6014 was safe and well tolerated up to 480 mg in HVs and at all doses in subjects with CF. POL6014 showed a dose-linear PK profile in both populations with C-max between 0.2 and 2.5 mu M in HVs and between 0.2 and 0.5 mu M in subjects with CF. T-max was reached at approximately 2-3 h. Mean POL6014 levels in CF sputum rapidly reached 1000 mu M and were still above 10 mu M at 24 h. >1-log reduction of active NE was observed at 3 h after dosing. Conclusion: Inhalation of POL6014 can safely lead to high concentrations within the lung and simultaneously low plasma concentrations, allowing for a clear inhibition of NE in the sputum of subjects with CF after single dosing. (C) 2019 Santhera Pharmaceuticals. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available