4.8 Review

Graphene-based nanomaterials: the promising active agents for antibiotics-independent antibacterial applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 307, Issue -, Pages 16-31

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.011

Keywords

Graphene; Nanomaterials; Antimicrobial agent; Drug resistance; Infection; Microorganism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81402860]
  2. Excellent Young Scientist Foundation of Sichuan University [2016SCU04A02]
  3. Huohuaku Foundation of Sichuan University [2018SCUH0083]
  4. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease [SKLOD201922]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene-based nanomaterials, such as graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), have shown great potentials in drug delivery and photodynamic/photothermal therapy due to their featured structure and physicochemical properties. In recent years, their antibacterial potentials have also been exploited. The commonly recognized antibacterial mechanisms include sharp edge-mediated cutting effect, oxidative stress and cell entrapment. This antibacterial activity is very important for human health. As we know, infection with the pathogenic bacteria, especially the drug-resistant ones, is a great threat to human lives. Thus, the development of the antibiotics-independent and drug-free antibacterial agents is of great importance and significance. Graphene-based nanomaterials are a kind of such antibacterial agents. An insight into their properties and antibacterial mechanisms is necessary before they are developed into real products. Herein, we provide a comprehensive understanding of the antibacterial application of graphene-based nanomaterials via summarizing their antibacterial activities against some typical microbial species and discussing their unique mechanisms. In addition, the side-effects and problems in using these nanomaterials are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available