4.8 Review

β Cell dysfunction during progression of metabolic syndrome to type 2 diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 129, Issue 10, Pages 4001-4008

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI129188

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Colorado Nutrition Obesity Research Center (NORC) [P30DK048520]
  2. Children's Diabetes Foundation ACORN grant
  3. NIH [UL1 TR002535, R01 DK082590, U01 DK072504, R01 DK63016219, R01 DK118155]
  4. Center for Woman's Health Research
  5. VA Merit [CX001532, BX002046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a society where physical activity is limited and food supply is abundant, metabolic diseases are becoming a serious epidemic. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) represents a cluster of metabolically related symptoms such as obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and carbohydrate intolerance, and significantly increases type 2 diabetes mellitus risk. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia are consistent characteristics of MetS, but which of these features is the initiating insult is still widely debated. Regardless, both of these conditions trigger adverse responses from the pancreatic beta cell, which is responsible for producing, storing, and releasing insulin to maintain glucose homeostasis. The observation that the degree of beta cell dysfunction correlates with the severity of MetS highlights the need to better understand beta cell dysfunction in the development of MetS. This Review focuses on the current understanding from rodent and human studies of the progression of beta cell responses during the development of MetS, as well as recent findings addressing the complexity of beta cell identity and heterogeneity within the islet during disease progression. The differential responses observed in beta cells together with the heterogeneity in disease phenotypes within the patient population emphasize the need to better understand the mechanisms behind beta cell adaptation, identity, and dysfunction in MetS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available