4.7 Article

A product classification approach to optimize circularity of critical resources - the case of NdFeB magnets

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 230, Issue -, Pages 90-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.048

Keywords

Critical resources; Circular economy; Product classification; Anthropogenic resource classification; Urban mining; NdFeB magnets

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The circular economy concept and critical resources have recently received significant momentum across the board. However, only little work is done so far to assess the role of circular economy strategies in reducing a system's vulnerability to the increasing supply risk experienced by a number of critical resources. This study is aimed at exploring different resource circularity options (e.g., reuse, refurbishment, remanufacturing, and recycling) for critical resources, such as neodymium (Nd) and dysprosium (Dy) that are two key rare earth elements (REEs) found in the neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) magnets, along their value chain. A product classification approach is presented to better understand the circularity potential of critical resources, which in this study is demonstrated by the case study of NdFeB magnets. The proposed approach allows for grouping products considering their most feasible resource circularity pathway. As a next step, the product classification approach leads to developing a theoretical framework for anthropogenic resource classification, inspired from the natural mineral resource classification system of the United States Geological Survey. The key advantage of anthropogenic resource classification is identification and grouping of products with respect to varying degree of economic and technical feasibility of resource recovery from them, under current and future framework conditions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available