4.7 Article

Exploring the microfoundations of end-user interests toward co-creating renewable energy technology innovations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 229, Issue -, Pages 203-212

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.296

Keywords

Co-creation; Innovation; Rewards; Energy; Prosumer; Variance-based structural equation modeling

Funding

  1. Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland [314319]
  2. Academy of Finland [279087]
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [279087, 314319, 314319, 279087] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy market transition, which is enabled by new affordable energy technologies and digitalization, opens novel opportunities for developing innovative energy solutions. These new technologies facilitate energy consumers to become local energy prosumers i.e. consumers and producers of energy using renewable energy sources. Hence, a central question for innovating new solutions emerges: how energy consumers and prosumers would engage in co-creating value and novel solutions with industry players? This article explores the microfoundations of energy consumers' and prosumers' interest to participate in co-creation activities with energy industry actors. Using survey data from five European countries and by applying variance-based structural equation modeling, we find that rewards and personal characteristics influence the interest to engage in co-creation activities. Specifically, the microfoundations of the interest are built upon the need for improvements, the intrinsic rewards, and the personal adopter characteristics. Additionally, we find differing microfoundations of interest for energy consumers and prosumers. We further discuss managerial and theoretical implications of our findings and highlight avenues for future research. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available