4.6 Article

Fast determination of aristolochic acid I (AAI) in traditional Chinese medicine soup with magnetic solid-phase extraction by high performance liquid chromatography

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1609, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460455

Keywords

Aristolochic acid I; Magnetic solid phase extraction; Traditional Chinese medicine soup; High performance liquid chromatography

Funding

  1. Key Laboratory of Cigarette Smoke, Technology Center of Shanghai Tobacco (Group) Corp.
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51708124]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel core-shell structure magnetic microsphere Fe3O4@SiO2-TPM@StVp(Fe3O4@SiO2-3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate@styrene and n-vinylpyrrolidone) was successfully synthesized and used as a magnetic solid-phase extraction adsorbent for extraction of aristolochic acid I (AAI) in traditional Chinese medicine soup. The prepared Fe3O4@SiO2-TPM@StVp was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The microspheres have various advantages of excellent hydrophilicity and pi-electron system, which is very suitable for determining target analytes followed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The main factors, including the pH of samples, amount of adsorbent, adsorption time, elution solvent and desorption time, were optimized. Under optimal conditions, the proposed method showed a wide linear range of 0.4-10 mu g/mL and a good correlation coefficient (R-2 = 0.9918). The pretreatment procedure was achieved within 10 min. The recoveries of aristolochic acid I in real samples range from 80.9% to 89.6% with relative standard deviations less than 4.9%, highlighting the accuracy of this method. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available