Leadless pacing with Micra TPS: A comparison between right ventricular outflow tract, mid-septal, and apical implant sites

Background With its steerable transcatheter delivery system, the Micra can be deployed in nonapical positions within the right ventricle, potentially allowing reduction of the paced QRS width. We sought to evaluate the safety and long-term performance of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pacing using the Micra transcatheter pacing system (TPS). We also compared the paced QRS between RVOT, mid-septal, and apical implant positions. Methods All patients who underwent a Micra TPS implantation at the University Hospitals of Leuven were enrolled in this observational study. Right ventricular (RV) position of the device was assessed on per-procedural ventriculography. Paced QRS was analyzed and follow-up completed at 1 month and then every 6 months. Results Among the 133 patients included (mean follow-up: 13 +/- 11 months), 45 were implanted in the RVOT, 58 midseptally, and 30 at the apex. All implant procedures were successful and no pericardial effusion was encountered within the 30 days post-implant. Two major complications were reported with devices implanted at the apex. Pacing impedance was significantly higher in the RVOT compared to the mid-septal and apical position (P < .001). Pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude did not differ over time in either position. The median narrowest paced QRS duration was observed in the RVOT (142 ms) compared to mid-septal (159 ms; P < .001), and apical position (181 ms; P < .001). Conclusion Implantation of the Micra TPS in the RVOT is safe and feasible. Electrical performance over time was comparable to mid-septal and apical positions. The narrowest paced QRS complexes is achieved with RVOT pacing.