4.7 Article

Freestanding core-shell Ni(OH)2@MnO2 structure with enhanced energy density and cyclic performance for asymmetric supercapacitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 803, Issue -, Pages 866-874

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.368

Keywords

Ni(OH)(2)@MnO2 composite; Core-shell structure; Potential window; Asymmetric supercapacitor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772083, 1402101and 51472083]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [14JJ3059and 2017JJ2008]
  3. Growth Scheme for Young Teachers of Hunan University [531107040185]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Hunan Province [2018GK1030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Core-shell structural Ni(OH)(2)@MnO2 electrodes with widened potential window and great stability are prepared through a two-step strategy, in which freestanding Ni(OH)(2) discs grow on nickel-foam as core and wrinkled MnO2 coatings are electrodeposited as shell. The MnO2 shell successfully inhibits the O-2 evolution process at the high oxidation potential so that the potential window of Ni(OH)(2)@MnO2 electrode is up to 1 V. Besides, the Ni(OH)(2)@MnO2 electrode presents a high specific capacity of 642.3 C g(-1) at 1 mV s(-1) and a long cyclic life without capacity fading, which is a breakthrough against the poor stability of reported Ni(OH)(2)/MnO2 electrodes Remarkably, an asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) constructed by Ni(OH)(2)@MnO2 electrode and activated carbon electrode delivers a high energy density of 66.7 Wh kg -1 at a power density of 485.7 W kg(-1) under potential window of 1.7 V. Furthermore, the ASC exhibits an energy density of 17.8 Wh kg(-1) at a high power density of 14571.4 W kg(-1) and a capacitance retention of 101.4% after 15,000 cycles, showing great rate capability and stable cyclic performance. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available