4.2 Article

Vitamin D and Cytokine Profiles in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis

Journal

JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 289-294

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001112

Keywords

cytokines; hypovitaminosis D; scleroderma; systemic sclerosis; vitamin D

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Hypovitaminosis D has been frequently described in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Cytokines are important mediators of tissue damage and clinical dysfunction in SSc and may be influenced by vitamin D levels. Objective To evaluate the serum levels of vitamin D and its correlation with the clinical features and cytokine profiles in SSc patients. Methods Case-control study, including 50 SSc patients and 35 healthy non matched controls. Serum levels of 25(OH) vitamin D were measured by chemiluminescence assay, and serum concentrations of interleukin 2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor, and interferon gamma were determined by flow cytometry. Results Fourteen patients (28%) had diffuse cutaneous SSc, 94% were female, 80% European derived, with a mean age of 57.2 +/- 12.8 years. The serum vitamin D levels in SSc patients were 23.9 +/- 8.5 ng/mL and 30.2 +/- 6.2 ng/mL in the control group (standardized mean difference -6.19; 95% confidence interval, -9.9 to -2.3;p= 0.002), despite the more frequent supplementation of vitamin D in SSc patients (p= 0.014). No significant associations were found among vitamin D concentrations and cytokine levels. Serum levels of IL-6 were significantly elevated in SSc patients (p= 0.024) and were positively correlated with the modified Rodnan skin score (r(s)= 0.291,p=0.041). Conclusions Despite lower vitamin D levels in SSc patients, there was no clear association with any cytokine. Serum levels of IL-6 were significantly elevated and positively correlated with the extent of skin involvement in SSc patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available