4.8 Article

Baltic Sea methanogens compete with acetogens for electrons from metallic iron

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 3011-3023

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-019-0490-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sapere Aude Danish Research Council [4181-00203]
  2. DFG Cluster of Excellence Inflammation at Interfaces
  3. DFG Cluster of Excellence Future Ocean

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbially induced corrosion of metallic iron (Fe-0)-containing structures is an environmental and economic hazard. Methanogens are abundant in low-sulfide environments and yet their specific role in Fe-0 corrosion is poorly understood. In this study, Sporomusa and Methanosarcina dominated enrichments from Baltic Sea methanogenic sediments that were established with Fe-0 as the sole electron donor and CO2 as the electron acceptor. The Baltic-Sporomusa was phylogenetically affiliated to the electroactive acetogen S. silvacetica. Baltic-Sporomusa adjusted rapidly to growth on H-2. On Fe-0, spent filtrate enhanced growth of this acetogen suggesting that it was using endogenous enzymes to retrieve electrons and produce acetate. Previous studies have proposed that acetate produced by acetogens can feed commensal acetoclastic methanogens such as Methanosarcina. However, Baltic-methanogens could not generate methane from acetate, plus the decrease or absence of acetogens stimulated their growth. The decrease in numbers of Sporomusa was concurrent with an upsurge in Methanosarcina and increased methane production, suggesting that methanogens compete with acetogens for electrons from Fe-0. Furthermore, Baltic-methanogens were unable to use H-2 (1.5 atm) for methanogenesis and were inhibited by spent filtrate additions, indicating that enzymatically produced H-2 is not a favorable electron donor. We hypothesize that Baltic-methanogens retrieve electrons from Fe-0 via a yet enigmatic direct electron uptake mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available