4.7 Article

Effect of strain rate on dynamic responses of laterally impacted steel plates

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 307-317

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.06.034

Keywords

Strain rate effect; Steel plate; Impact test; Numerical simulation; Dynamic response; Failure

Funding

  1. National Key Technologies Research & Development Program [2017YFE0118000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51709212]
  3. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundacdo para a Ciencia e Tecnologia -FCT) [UID/Multi/00134/2013 -LISBOA-010145-FEDER-007629]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quasi-static punching tests and low-velocity impact tests have been conducted to examine the plastic response and failure of clamped rectangular steel plates struck by hemispherical indenters. The length, width and thickness of plate specimens are 127, 76 and 1.4 mm, respectively. Experimentally obtained quasi-static and dynamic force-displacement responses are compared to reveal the influence of dynamic material characteristics on the impact behaviour of steel plates. The failure mode of laterally impacted plates is exposed to further illustrate the dynamic material properties. The experimental results are compared with numerical simulations performed by the LS-DYNA finite element solver. The finite element model includes defining the material strain hardening, strain rate sensitivity and critical fracture strain. A simplified method is proposed to characterise the material strain rate effect at varied plastic strains in the simulations. A good agreement is observed between experimental and numerical results, demonstrating the rationality of the material definitions in low-velocity impact. The paper contributes to enhance the industry practice in impact simulations of steel structures when only material quasi static tensile tests are available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available