4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Debris characteristics and scattering pattern analysis of reinforced concrete slabs subjected to internal blast loads-a numerical study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 1-16

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.04.024

Keywords

Blast load; Reinforced concrete; Fragmentation; Debris characteristics; Projectile distance

Funding

  1. Major Program of Technological Innovation of Hubei Province, China [2017ACA102]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41502283, 41772309]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1501302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High velocity debris is a major threat to the safety of the surrounding area during an explosion accident. Since reinforced concrete (RC) is the most universal civil and military building material, it is of great significance to study the characteristics and launching trajectory of debris following a blast load. In this study, based on the LS-DYNA software, the dynamic failure process of an RC slab under an internal blast load is first investigated using the Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) method and the multi-material fluid-solid coupling method. For fulfilment, a zero-thickness cohesive element is introduced to simulate the concrete failure under a blast load in order to avoid the mass loss caused by a conventional element erosion algorithm. Then, since it is very time-consuming to conduct an LS-DYNA simulation through to the end, which is when all the debris has landed on the ground, a faster scheme is proposed in tandem with the LS-DYNA numerical analysis to predict the flight path and scattering pattern of the debris produced. Finally, the size distribution, launching angle, launching velocity and projectile distance of the debris following the breakup of the RC slab under different internal blast loads are analysed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available