4.5 Review

Corticosteroid-Free Remission vs Overall Remission in Clinical Trials of Moderate-Severe Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease

Journal

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 515-523

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izz193

Keywords

end points; clinical trials; ulcerative colitis; Crohn's disease; maintenance therapy

Funding

  1. NIDDK [K23DK117058]
  2. American College of Gastroenterology Junior Faculty Development Award
  3. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation Career Development Award [404614]
  4. Pfizer
  5. AbbVie
  6. AMAG Pharmaceuticals
  7. Takeda
  8. Prometheus, Polymedco
  9. Abbvie
  10. Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc.
  11. Robarts Clinical Trials Inc.
  12. Millennium Pharmaceuticals
  13. Tillotts Pharma
  14. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  15. Elan/Biogen
  16. UCB Pharma
  17. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  18. Genentech
  19. ActoGenix
  20. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
  21. Unity Pharmaceuticals, Albireo Pharma
  22. GiCare Pharma
  23. Sigmoid Pharma
  24. UCB
  25. JJ/Janssen
  26. Atlantic Healthcare Limited
  27. Celgene/Receptos
  28. Allergan
  29. Arena Pharmaceuticals
  30. BeiGene
  31. Conatus
  32. Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Research
  33. Lilly
  34. Otsuka
  35. Prizer, Precision IBD, Progenity
  36. Shire
  37. Sigmoid Biotechnologies, Sterna Biologicals
  38. Progenity
  39. John and Susan McDonald Endowed IBD Chair at Western University
  40. Eli Lilly
  41. Pendopharm
  42. Robarts Clinical Trials, Topivert

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We summarized the protocol-specified corticosteroid tapering regimens in clinical trials of moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) and calculated differences in rates of clinical remission vs corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CR). Methods: Through a systematic literature review through February 28, 2019, we identified 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of biologics or small molecules in patients with moderate-severe UC or CD who reported CSF-CR as an outcome. We estimated the relative risk and 95% confidence interval of achieving CSF-CR vs overall clinical remission in patients treated with active intervention or placebo through random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Across trials of UC (11 trials) and CD (5 trials), a median of 53% and 49% of participants were on corticosteroids at the time of trial entry, respectively. Participants were allowed to enter trials at a median corticosteroid dose (range) of 35 (20-40) mg/d. Doses were kept stable for a median (range) of 8 (5-10) weeks during induction therapy, after which a mandatory and structured taper was implemented, albeit with the investigators' discretion depending on clinical status. Pooled rates of CSF-CR in patients with UC and CD treated with placebo were 9.7% and 19.1%, respectively. In UC and CD trials, the rate of CSF-CR was 24% and 18% lower than the rate of overall clinical remission, respectively. Conclusions: Protocol-specified corticosteroid tapering regimens vary across trials. These findings will help to inform the design and interpretation of future clinical trials and highlight the need for standardization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available