4.7 Article

Closed-Form Analysis of Non-Linear Age of Information in Status Updates With an Energy Harvesting Transmitter

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 4129-4142

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TWC.2019.2921372

Keywords

Age of information; energy harvesting; status update; queuing theory; Internet of Things

Funding

  1. Nature Science Foundation of China [61571265, 91638204, 61701275, 61861136003, 61621091]
  2. Hitachi, Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Timely status updates are crucial to enabling applications in the massive Internet of Things (IoT). This paper measures the data-freshness performance of a status update system with an energy-harvesting transmitter, considering the randomness in information generation, transmission, and energy harvesting. The performance is evaluated by a nonlinear function of age of information (AoI) that is defined as the time elapsed since the generation of the most up-to-date status information at the receiver. The system is formulated as two queues with status packet generation and energy arrivals both assumed to be Poisson processes. With negligible service time, both first-come-first-served (FCFS) and last-come-first-served (LCFS) disciplines for arbitrary buffer and battery capacities are considered, and a method for calculating the average penalty with non-linear penalty functions is proposed. The average Aol, the average penalty under exponential penalty function, and the Ad's threshold violation probability are obtained in a closed form. When the service time is assumed to follow exponential distribution, a matrix geometric method is used to obtain the average peak AoI. The results illustrate that under the FCFS discipline, the status update frequency needs to be carefully chosen according to the service rate and energy arrival rate in order to minimize the average penalty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available