4.7 Article

Driver-Behavior-Based Adaptive Steering Robust Nonlinear Control of Unmanned Driving Robotic Vehicle With Modeling Uncertainties and Disturbance Observer

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 8, Pages 8183-8190

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2019.2922452

Keywords

Driver behavior; modeling uncertainties; nonlinear disturbance observer (NDO); steering control; (unmanned driving robot) UDR

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675281]
  2. Six Talents Peak Project of Jiangsu Province [2015-JXQC-003]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30918011101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an adaptive steering robust nonlinear control method based on driver behavior is presented for an unmanned driving robotic vehicle (UDRV), in order to achieve accurate and stable steering control of UDRV. Considering modeling uncertainties and unknown nonlinear external disturbances, a UDRV nonlinear dynamics model is established. A driver behavior model is established considering a coordinate transformation model, a driver virtual path planning model, and a driver desired yaw rate model. On the basis of this, an adaptive steering robust nonlinear controller for UDRV is presented, consisting of an adaptive robust backstepping controller and a nonlinear disturbance observer (NDO). The NDO is designed to compensate for modeling uncertainties and unknown nonlinear external disturbances. The adaptive steering robust nonlinear controller for UDRV is designed through backstepping method and NDO compensation. The stability of control system is proved. Finally, double lane change experiments are conducted. Comparison analysis results among the proposed control method, other existed control method, and human driver demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available