4.7 Article

Prior Information Guided Regularized Deep Learning for Cell Nucleus Detection

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 38, Issue 9, Pages 2047-2058

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2019.2895318

Keywords

Nucleus detection; deep learning; convolutional neural networks; shape priors; learnable shapes

Funding

  1. NSF CAREER Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell nuclei detection is a challenging research topic because of limitations in cellular image quality and diversity of nuclear morphology, i.e., varying nuclei shapes, sizes, and overlaps between multiple cell nuclei. This has been a topic of enduring interest with promising recent success shown by deep learning methods. These methods train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with a training set of input images and known, labeled nuclei locations. Many such methods are supplemented by spatial or morphological processing. Using a set of canonical cell nuclei shapes, prepared with the help of a domain expert, we develop a new approach that we call shape priors (SPs) with CNNs (SPs-CNN). We further extend the network to introduce an SP layer and then allowing it to become trainable (i.e., optimizable). We call this network as tunable SP-CNN (TSP-CNN). In summary, we present new network structures that can incorporate expected behavior of nucleus shapes via two components: learnable layers that perform the nucleus detection and a fixed processing part that guides the learning with prior information. Analytically, we formulate two new regularization terms that are targeted at: 1) learning the shapes and 2) reducing false positives while simultaneously encouraging detection inside the cell nucleus boundary. Experimental results on two challenging datasets reveal that the proposed SP-CNN and TSP-CNN can outperform the state-of-the-art alternatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available