4.7 Article

Segment-Based Disparity Refinement With Occlusion Handling for Stereo Matching

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 3885-3897

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2019.2903318

Keywords

Stereo vision; disparity refinement; Markov random fields; RANSAC; Bayesian inference

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61773365]
  2. Major Project of the Guangdong Province Science and Technology Department [2014B090919002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we propose a disparity refinement method that directly refines the winner-take-all (WTA) disparity map by exploring its statistical significance. According to the primary steps of the segment-based stereo matching, the reference image is over-segmented into superpixels and a disparity plane is fitted f o r each superpixel by an improved random sample consensus (RANSAC). We design a two-layer optimization to refine the disparity plane. In the global optimization, mean disparities of superpixels are estimated by Markov random field (MRF) inference, and then, a 3D neighborhood system is derived from the mean disparities for occlusion handling. In the local optimization, a probability model exploiting Bayesian inference and Bayesian prediction is adopted and achieves second-order smoothness implicitly among 3D neighbors. The two-layer optimization is a pure disparity refinement method because no correlation information between stereo image pairs is demanded during the refinement. Experimental results on the Middlebury and KITTI datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can perform accurate stereo matching with a faster speed and handle the occlusion effectively. It can be indicated that the matching cost computation + disparity refinement framework is a possible solution to produce accurate disparity map at low computational cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available