4.8 Article

Modeling Accelerated Degradation Data Based on the Uncertain Process

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 1532-1542

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2883016

Keywords

Accelerated degradation testing (ADT); belief reliability; epistemic uncertainty; uncertain process; uncertainty theory

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61573043, 71671009, 61104182]
  2. Science Challenge Project [TZ2018007]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YWF-18-BJ-Y-157]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accelerated degradation testing (ADT) aids the reliability and lifetime evaluations for highly reliable products. In engineering applications, the number of test items is generally small due to finance or testing resource constraints, which leads to the rare knowledge to evaluate reliability and lifetime. Consequently, the epistemic uncertainty is embedded in ADT data and the large-sample based probability theory is no longer appropriate. In this paper, we introduce the uncertainty theory, which is a theory different from the probability theory, to account for such uncertainty due to small samples and build up a framework of ADT modeling. In this framework, an uncertain accelerated degradation model is first proposed based on the arithmetic Liu process. Then, the uncertain statistics for parameter estimations are presented correspondingly, which is completely constructed on objectively observed ADT data. An application case and a simulation case are used to illustrate the proposed methodology. With further comparisons to the Wiener process based accelerated degradation model (WADM) and the Bayesian-WADM, the sensitivities of these models to sample sizes are explored and the results show that the proposed model is superior to the other two probability-based models under the small sample size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available