4.6 Article

3-D Microwave Tomography Using the Soft Prior Regularization Technique: Evaluation in Anatomically Realistic MRI-Derived Numerical Breast Phantoms

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 66, Issue 9, Pages 2566-2575

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2892303

Keywords

Breast cancer; microwave tomography; MRI; multimodality imaging; soft prior regularization

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI [RO1 CA191227-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Fusion of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) breast images with microwave tomography is accomplished through a soft prior technique, which incorporates spatial information (from MRI), i. e., accurate boundary location of different regions of interest, into the regularization process of the microwave image reconstruction algorithm. Methods: Numerical experiments were completed on a set of three-dimensional (3-D) breast geometries derived from MR breast data with different parenchymal densities, as well as a simulated tumor to evaluate the performance over a range of breast shapes, sizes, and property distributions. Results: When the soft prior regularization technique was applied, both permittivity and conductivity relative root mean square error values decreased by more than 87% across all breast densities, except in two cases where the error decrease was only 55% and 78%. In addition, the incorporation of structural priors increased contrast between tumor and fibroglandular tissue by 59% in permittivity and 192% in conductivity. Conclusion: This study confirmed that the soft prior algorithm is robust in 3-D and can function successfully across a range of complex geometries and tissue property distributions. Significance: This study demonstrates that our microwave tomography is capable of recovering accurate tissue property distributions when spatial information from MRI is incorporated through soft prior regularization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available