4.8 Article

Biogeographic variation in temperature sensitivity of decomposition in forest soils

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 1873-1885

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14838

Keywords

carbon cycle; carbon cycle modelling; carbon decomposition; climate change; forest; Q(10); spatial heterogeneity; temperature sensitivity

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1406402, 2017YFC1200100]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP170102766]
  3. National Science Foundation of China [41630528, 31670491]
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. Young Thousand Talents Program Scholar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining soil carbon (C) responses to rising temperature is critical for projections of the feedbacks between terrestrial ecosystems, C cycle, and climate change. However, the direction and magnitude of this feedback remain highly uncertain due largely to our limited understanding of the spatial heterogeneity of soil C decomposition and its temperature sensitivity. Here we quantified C decomposition and its response to temperature change with an incubation study of soils from 203 sites across tropical to boreal forests in China spanning a wide range of latitudes (18 degrees 16 ' to 51 degrees 37 ' N) and longitudes (81 degrees 01 ' to 129 degrees 28 ' E). Mean annual temperature (MAT) and mean annual precipitation primarily explained the biogeographic variation in the decomposition rate and temperature sensitivity of soils: soil C decomposition rate decreased from warm and wet forests to cold and dry forests, while Q(10-MAT) (standardized to the MAT of each site) values displayed the opposite pattern. In contrast, biological factors (i.e. plant productivity and soil bacterial diversity) and soil factors (e.g. clay, pH, and C availability of microbial biomass C and dissolved organic C) played relatively small roles in the biogeographic patterns. Moreover, no significant relationship was found between Q(10-MAT) and soil C quality, challenging the current C quality-temperature hypothesis. Using a single, fixed Q(10-MAT) value (the mean across all forests), as is usually done in model predictions, would bias the estimated soil CO2 emissions at a temperature increase of 3.0 degrees C. This would lead to overestimation of emissions in warm biomes, underestimation in cold biomes, and likely significant overestimation of overall C release from soil to the atmosphere. Our results highlight that climate-related biogeographic variation in soil C responses to temperature needs to be included in next-generation C cycle models to improve predictions of C-climate feedbacks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available