4.5 Article

Cytotoxic cardenolides from the latex of Calotropis procera

Journal

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages 4615-4620

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.08.044

Keywords

Calotropis procera; Asclepiadaceae; Cardenolides; Cytotoxicity; Antimicrobial activity

Funding

  1. National Program on Key Basic Research Project - China (973 program) [2013CB734000, 2012CB725200, 2012CB721006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81102369, 30901849, 30911120483, 81102356, 30973665, 30911120484]
  3. CAS Pillar Program China [XDA04074000]
  4. Assiut University - Egypt
  5. National Distinguished Young Scholar Program in China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three new cardenolides (3, 9 and 10), along with eight known ones, were isolated from the latex of Calotropis procera. The structural determination was accomplished by the 1D- and 2D-NMR spectra as well as HRESIMS analysis. The growth inhibitory activity of the latex and its sub-fractions as well as isolated compounds was evaluated against human A549 and Hela cell lines. The results exhibited that latex had strong growth inhibitory activity with IC(50)s of (3.37 mu M, A-549) and (6.45 mu M, Hela). Among the four extracts (hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and aqueous), chloroform extract displayed the highest potential cytotoxic activity, with IC(50)s of (0.985 mu M, A-549) and (1.471 mu M, Hela). All the isolated compounds displayed various degrees of cytotoxic activity and the highest activity was observed by calactin (1) with IC(50)s values of (0.036 mu M, A-549) and (0.083 mu M, Hela). None of these isolated compounds exhibited good antimicrobial activity evaluated by determination of their MICs using the broth microdilution method against various infectious pathogens. The structure-activity relationships for cytotoxic activity were also discussed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available