4.6 Article

Adapting ACMG/AMP sequence variant classification guidelines for single-gene copy number variants

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 336-344

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0655-2

Keywords

copy number variant (CNV); variant interpretation; variant classification guidelines; PVS1; ACMG; AMP criteria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The ability of a single technology, next-generation sequencing, to provide both sequence and copy number variant (CNV) results has driven the merger of clinical cytogenetics and molecular genetics. Consequently, the distinction between the definition of a sequence variant and a CNV is blurry. As the 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) standards and guidelines for interpretation of sequence variants address CNV classification only sparingly, this study focused on adapting ACMG/AMP criteria for single-gene CNV interpretation. Methods CNV-specific modifications of the 2015 ACMG/AMP criteria were developed and their utility was independently tested by three diagnostic laboratories. Each laboratory team interpreted the same 12 single-gene CNVs using three systems: (1) without ACMG/AMP guidance, (2) with ACMG/AMP criteria, and (3) with new modifications. A replication study of 12 different CNVs validated the modified criteria. Results The adapted criteria system presented here showed improved concordance and usability for single-gene CNVs compared with using the ACMG/AMP interpretation guidelines focused on sequence variants. Conclusion These single-gene CNV criteria modifications could be used as a supplement to the ACMG/AMP guidelines for sequence variants, allowing for a streamlined workflow and a step toward a uniform classification system for both sequence and copy number alterations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available