4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A comprehensive review on thermochemical, biological, biochemical and hybrid conversion methods of bio-derived lignocellulosic molecules into renewable fuels

Journal

FUEL
Volume 251, Issue -, Pages 352-367

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.049

Keywords

Lignocelluloses; Cellulose; Biofuel; Biorefineries; Hybrid-conversion; Sustainability

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Korea government (MOTIE) [20188550000540]
  2. Ton Duc Thang University, Hochi Minh City, Vietnam
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20188550000540] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, the conversion (thermochemical, biological and hybrid) of chemical energy chiefly enclosed in biomass structures i.e. as 30-50% cellulose, 15-35% hemicellulose and 10-20% lignin into various forms of fuels/energy products is comparatively analyzed. Cellulose and hemicelluloses formulate almost similar to 70% of the biomass and are definitely linked to the lignin structural units all the way through covalent and hydrogenic bonds; thereby, the structure formulated is tremendously rigid and resistive against processing. Hence, the vital confront towards the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into important bio-yields via biorefining is to overcome this obstacle. This article gives an outlook over the major conversion technologies to produce biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass feedstock, by focusing on their typical performances. The core points outlined and argued will be the currently positioned pathways, utilizing the lignocellulosic materials to produce (bio) fuels, prospect on biomass supplies, and discussion on the impact of sustainability criteria, main influencing factors and uncertainties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available