4.7 Article

The effect of fuel composition on particulate emissions from a highly boosted GDI engine - An evaluation of three particulate indices

Journal

FUEL
Volume 252, Issue -, Pages 598-611

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.115

Keywords

PN; Particulate; Fuel effects; GDI; Downsizing; Boost; PM index; PN index

Funding

  1. Jaguar Land Rover
  2. Shell
  3. Innovate UK
  4. EPSRC [EP/I011331/1]
  5. EPSRC [EP/I011331/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) engines equipped with a turbocharger or supercharger (known as boosted engines) have achieved significant market penetration due to their advantages in reducing CO2 emissions compared to Port Fuel Injection (PFI) engines. These engines are known to emit particulate matter and recent studies have characterized these emissions. Fuel composition is known to have an impact on Particle Number (PN) emissions from GDI engines, however its effect on emissions from highly boosted engines is not known. In this work, 10 different fuels have been tested on an extremely highly boosted engine (at up to 35 bar BMEP) at several different operating conditions both unboosted and boosted and the PN emissions and size distributions have been measured using a Cambustion DMS500. The applicability of three previously developed indices linking fuel composition to PN emissions is tested with the results from these fuels. The results show that the PM index is a good predictor of PN emissions from this engine for all fuels at all operating points (unboosted and boosted). The Moriya and PN indices predict the PN emissions using fuels that are market representative, but are poor predictors of PN emissions over all of the fuels tested. Very small accumulation mode particle sizes of around 30 nm have been noted from all fuels at boosted conditions, which has relevance to future legislation and after treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available