4.6 Article

The effect of pair-instability mass loss on black-hole mergers

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 594, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628980

Keywords

stars: massive; black hole physics; gravitational waves

Funding

  1. NCN grant Sonata Bis 2 [Dec-2012/07/E/ST9/01360]
  2. NCN grant OPUS [2015/19/B/ST9/01099]
  3. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  4. CAASTRO
  5. Stromlo Distinguished Visitor Program at the Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian National University, Canberra
  6. Australian Research Council through an ARC Future Fellowship [FT120100363]
  7. US National Science Foundation [PHY-1430152]
  8. NCN [UMO-2014/15/Z/ST9/00038]
  9. NSF [PHY 1505629, AST 1412449]
  10. NSF CAREER grant [PHY-1151836, PHY-1055103]
  11. Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago through NSF [PHY-1125897]
  12. FCT under the IF2014 Programme [IF/00797/2014/CP1214/CT0012]
  13. [H2020-MSCA-RISE-2015]
  14. [StronGrHEP-690904]
  15. Division Of Physics
  16. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1505629, 1607130, 1430152] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  17. Division Of Physics
  18. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1055103, 1125897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Mergers of two stellar-origin black holes are a prime source of gravitational waves and are under intensive investigation. One crucial ingredient in their modeling has been neglected: pair-instability pulsation supernovae with associated severe mass loss may suppress the formation of massive black holes, decreasing black-hole-merger rates for the highest black-hole masses. Aims. We demonstrate the effects of pair-instability pulsation supernovae on merger rate and mass using populations of double black-hole binaries formed through the isolated binary classical evolution channel. Methods. The mass loss from pair-instability pulsation supernova is estimated based on existing hydrodynamical calculations. This mass loss is incorporated into the StarTrack population synthesis code. StarTrack is used to generate double black-hole populations with and without pair-instability pulsation supernova mass loss. Results. The mass loss associated with pair-instability pulsation supernovae limits the Population I/II stellar-origin black-hole mass to 50 M-circle dot, in tension with earlier predictions that the maximum black-hole mass could be as high as 100 M-circle dot. In our model, neutron stars form with mass 1 2 M-circle dot. We then encounter the first mass gap at 2 5 M-circle dot with the compact object absence due to rapid supernova explosions, followed by the formation of black holes with mass 5 50 M-circle dot, with a second mass gap at 50 135 M-circle dot created by pair-instability pulsation supernovae and by pair-instability supernovae. Finally, black holes with masses above 135 M-circle dot may potentially form to arbitrarily high mass limited only by the extent of the initial mass function and the strength of stellar winds. Suppression of double black-hole-merger rates by pair-instability pulsation supernovae is negligible for our evolutionary channel. Our standard evolutionary model, with the inclusion of pair-instability pulsation supernovae and pair-instability supernovae, is fully consistent with the Laser Interferometric Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) observations of black-hole mergers: GW150914, GW151226, and LVT151012. The LIGO results are inconsistent with high (greater than or similar to 400 km s(-1)) black hole (BH) natal kicks. We predict the detection of several, and up to as many as similar to 60, BH-BH mergers with a total mass of 10 150 M-circle dot (most likely range: 20 80 M-circle dot) in the forthcoming similar to 60 effective days of the LIGO O2 observations, assuming the detectors reach the optimistic target O2 sensitivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available