4.6 Article

Asteroseismology of 19 low-luminosity red giant stars from Kepler

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 591, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628311

Keywords

asteroseismology; stars: general; stars: interiors

Funding

  1. FEDER funds [IACA13-3E-2493]
  2. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  3. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (SPACEINN) [312844]
  4. CNES GOLF grant at CEA
  5. PLATO grant at CEA
  6. ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche, France) program IDEE Interaction Des Etoiles et des Exoplanetes [ANR-12-BS05-0008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Frequencies of acoustic and mixed modes in red giant stars are now determined with high precision thanks to the long continuous observations provided by the NASA's Kepler mission. Here we consider the eigenfrequencies of nineteen low-luminosity red giant stars selected in a recent publication for a detailed peak-bagging analysis. Aims. Our objective is to obtain stellar parameters by using individual mode frequencies and spectroscopic information. Methods. We use a forward modelling technique based on a minimization procedure combining the frequencies of the p-modes, the period spacing of the dipolar modes, and the spectroscopic data. Results. Consistent results between the forward modelling technique and values derived from the seismic scaling relations are found but the errors derived using the former technique are lower. The average error for log g is 0.002 dex, compared to 0.011 dex from the frequency of maximum power, v(max), and 0.10 dex from the spectroscopic analysis. Relative errors in the masses and radii are on average 2% and 0.5% respectively, compared to 3% and 2% derived from the scaling relations. No reliable determination of the initial helium abundances and the mixing length parameters could be made. Finally, for our grid of models with given input physics, we found that low-mass stars require higher values of the overshooting parameter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available