4.4 Article

Modified energy harvesting figures of merit for stress- and strain-driven piezoelectric systems

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS
Volume 228, Issue 7, Pages 1537-1554

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2019-800143-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-2014-STG-639526]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union [320963]
  3. EPSRC [1941829] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Piezoelectrics are an important class of materials for mechanical energy harvesting technologies. In this paper we evaluate the piezoelectric harvesting process and define the key material properties that should be considered for effective material design and selection. Porous piezoceramics have been shown previously to display improved harvesting properties compared to their dense counterparts due to the reduction in permittivity associated with the introduction of porosity. We further this concept by considering the effect of the increased mechanical compliance of porous piezoceramics on the energy conversion efficiency and output electrical power. Finite element modelling is used to investigate the effect of porosity on relevant energy harvesting figures of merit. The increase in compliance due to porosity is shown to increase both the amount of mechanical energy transmitted into the system under stress-driven conditions, and the stress-driven figure of merit, FoM(33)(X), despite a reduction in the electromechanical coupling coefficient. We show the importance of understanding whether a piezoelectric energy harvester is stress- or strain-driven, and demonstrate how porosity can be used to tailor the electrical and mechanical properties of piezoceramic harvesters. Finally, we derive two new figures of merit based on the consideration of each stage in the piezoelectric harvesting process and whether the system is stress- (F-ij(X)), or strain-driven (F-ij(x)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available