4.6 Article

Departure from the constant-period ephemeris for the transiting exoplanet WASP-12 b

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 588, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628312

Keywords

stars: individual: WASP-12; planets and satellites: individual: WASP-12 b; planet-star interactions

Funding

  1. European Community [RG226604]
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education through the Iuventus Plus [IP2011 031971]
  3. KASI [2013-9-400-00]
  4. KRCF Young Scientist Research Fellowship Program
  5. Shumen University [RD 08-81]
  6. [AYA2014-54348-C3-1-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. Most hot Jupiters are expected to spiral in toward their host stars because the angular momentum of the orbital motion is transferred to the stellar spin. Their orbits can also precess as a result of planet-star interactions. Calculations show that both effects might be detected for the very-hot exoplanet WASP-12 b using the method of precise transit-timing over a time span of about 10 yr. Methods. We acquired new precise light curves for 29 transits of WASP-12 b, spannning four observing seasons from November 2012 to February 2016. New mid-transit times, together with those from the literature, were used to refine the transit ephemeris and analyze the timing residuals. Results. We find that the transit times of WASP-12 b do not follow a linear ephemeris with a 5 sigma confidence level. They may be approximated with a quadratic ephemeris that gives a change rate in the orbital period of (-2.56 +/- 0.40)x10(-2) s yr(-1). The tidal quality parameter of the host star was found to be equal to 2.5 x 10(5), which is similar to theoretical predictions for Sun-like stars. We also considered a model in which the observed timing residuals are interpreted as a result of the apsidal precession. We find, however, that this model is statistically less probable than the orbital decay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available